Estimated time to complete this section: 13 minutes
We might not immediately consider numerical data when researching local history. Yet, family inventories, census records, tax assessments, membership rosters, social surveys, mortality and disease data, and city directories that might reside in library collections have the capability to both fill gaps and add new perspectives to community narratives. The process of analyzing numbers requires that we make three determinations:
- How reliable are these numbers?
- Which questions can we ask of the numbers available to us?
- Which are the best ways to organize and read the numbers to answer our questions?
3.7 Video
- 1804 Inventory (Total Video Time: 10:59; video transcripts on page)
How reliable are the numbers? | Determining the reliability of numbers is essential. It’s common to assume that numbers are objective, but as with any other source, they were collected within and are a reflection of a specific context. It is essential to ask questions about the operating assumptions and biases grounding the collection and dissemination of these numbers, and to account for them throughout your work.
|
What questions can we ask of these numbers? | Once you have determined the reliability of the numbers, you can review them to consider the kinds of historical questions they can (and cannot) help you answer. Note-the following questions are examples:
|
Which are the best ways to organize and read the numbers to answer our questions? |
Example: using census records to track the number of people living in a location over time.
As you identify patterns and visualize the numbers, remember the operating assumptions and biases that informed the initial collection and dissemination of these numbers.
|
adapted from Gary Kornblith, “Making Sense of Numbers,” History Matters: The U.S. Survey Course on the Web,http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mse/numbers/, July 2002.
Previous Section | Next Section